Mammal recovery inside and outside terrestrial protected areas


Journal article


K. M. Magoulick, Vanessa Hull, Jianguo Liu
Ambio, 2024

Semantic Scholar DOI PubMedCentral PubMed
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Magoulick, K. M., Hull, V., & Liu, J. (2024). Mammal recovery inside and outside terrestrial protected areas. Ambio.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Magoulick, K. M., Vanessa Hull, and Jianguo Liu. “Mammal Recovery inside and Outside Terrestrial Protected Areas.” Ambio (2024).


MLA   Click to copy
Magoulick, K. M., et al. “Mammal Recovery inside and Outside Terrestrial Protected Areas.” Ambio, 2024.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{k2024a,
  title = {Mammal recovery inside and outside terrestrial protected areas},
  year = {2024},
  journal = {Ambio},
  author = {Magoulick, K. M. and Hull, Vanessa and Liu, Jianguo}
}

Abstract

Protected areas are a key component of global conservation, and the world is aiming to increase protected areas to cover 30% of land and water through the 30 × 30 Initiative under the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. However, factors affecting their success or failure in regard to promoting mammal population recovery are not well studied, particularly using quantitative approaches comparing across diverse taxa, biomes, and countries. To better understand how protected areas contribute to mammalian recovery, we conducted an analysis of 2706 mammal populations both inside and outside of protected areas worldwide. We calculated the annual percent change of mammal populations within and outside of terrestrial protected areas and examined the relationship between the percent change and a suite of human and natural characteristics including biome, region, International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) protected area category, IUCN Red List classification, and taxonomic order. Our results show that overall mammal populations inside and outside of protected areas are relatively stable. It appears that Threatened mammals are doing better inside of protected areas than outside, whereas the opposite is true for species of least concern and Near Threatened species. We also found significant population increases in protected areas classified as category III and significant population decreases in protected and unprotected areas throughout Oceania. Our results demonstrate that terrestrial protected areas can be an important approach for mammalian recovery and conservation. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13280-024-02014-7.